Bridgestone revo 3 tire2/4/2024 ![]() On the other hand, the Bridgestone Dueler offers a more close up design with chunkier blocks so naturally more grip and lateral g forces are produced here.Īlthough, the overall difference between both tire’s handling time is under one second. One, it’s wider lateral grooves eat away the rubber area that would have been in contact with the surface, and two, it’s softer rubber (despite spirally wound cap ply), does not produce enough lateral stability. So here again, the Yokohama Geolandar AT lacks behind slightly, for two main reasons. Dry Handlingĭry handling depends on shoulders, as they get to meet the road, the most, while cornering. ![]() So with fatter 2 rib design, and a stiffer compound, the tire offers a better directional stability which results in shorter braking distances (which is how grip is measured). On the other side, the Bridgestone Dueler AT Revo 3 offers fatter ribs, though the tire also makes 3 longitudinal channels. Moreover, softer rubber compounds with high silica density don’t do so good, and Geolandar offers a very spongy rubber, which does not provide as much stability, so grip gets limited. The tire simply allows less area of it’s rubber available to connect with the road, as most of that area becomes limited with several notches and wider circumferential grooves, making ribs smaller in size. So here, the Yokohama Geolandar AT G105 does not offer a better dry grip when compared. The dry grip of a tire has a lot to do with the rubber composition and overall structure, which includes, tire’s tread, weight and other other aspects. Here the performance is analyzed by looking at the grip and handling capabilities in dry conditions with average temperatures. When it comes to dry roads although all terrain tires aren’t as capable of performing as passenger tires, there are still some on road oriented tires that do surprisingly well, and both of our tires here are in that list. ![]() The Bridgestone Revo 3 on the other side, although is not too bad here, Tread Wear:īoth tires offer similar rolling resistance values that’s why both provide you with 60k miles tread wear warranty for P metric sizes.īut Yokohama goes one step forward and also offers 50k miles warranty for LT sizes as well. Moving form the passenger tire to this one, you will not feed any difference.Ĭomfort is actually two parts, one is tread noise and the other has to do with bumps absorption and this tire is better in both. The Yokohama Geolandar G015 is one of the most comfortable tires in the all terrain category. That’s why they offers such a spongy compound on winter tires. The Bridgestone Dueler on the other hand, is stiff, so on ice the tire’s siping and notches are not that effective. The tire offer a softer compound which does not harden up too much with freezing temperatures, and its biters everywhere grip the snow and ice in a better way. The Yokohama Geolandar G015 is 3 Peak Mountain Snowflake rated, which tells us that the tire is not only better here in comparison, it also offers 25% more acceleration on snow compared to average all seasons tire. This also enhances the lateral stability on Geolandar a little bit more in comparison. Well, with a spirally wound nylon reinforcements, the Yokohama G015 protects sidewalls in a better way without increasing its overall weight by a lot. In case of Yokohama Geolandar AT, the cap plies of nylon are spirally wound, whereas on Bridgestone Dueler AT, they just cover the central area. DurabilityĪlthough both tires offer you with a two-ply polyester cover, with two wide steel belts running on top. However, the tire makes larger sidewall lugs, which are pasted on a bigger surface area. Towards outer edges, the tire is very similar to Geolandar G015, as all blocks are staggered on themselves, with stepped edges. Bridgestone Dueler AT Revo 3 Shoulder Blocksīut it’s shoulder lugs are comparatively more packed together.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |